The Art of Deception
From Syria to 'Afghanistan, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the Arab Springs, media wars - those that are fought in the mainstream media, to the search for consensus and the control of international public opinion - have become more important than the wars of combat, those fighting each other instead of on the battlefield. And it is only in appearance that the first victims are less of the latter. The first kill in fact the truth, burying it (or annacquandola) in the sea of propaganda and disinformation. And this prevents us citizens to exercise our right and duty to be informed, in a free and fair.
The media as weapons is dedicated the last special issue of Limes. And there are various interesting thoughts about it, even in relation to the current geo-media theaters. Common is the underlining of the excessive power exercised today by the storytelling, an ancient art and that in the past has been an important instrument of shared values - as explained by a great book came out a few years ago - but it has become the present day in a terrible weapon of persuasion in the hands of the gurus of marketing, management and communication policy and military, through which mold the opinions not only of consumers but also the public. Now - it is a matter under the eyes of all - do not sell neither the facts nor the ideas but the "stories". And stories are so well-scripted, so exciting, that it is hard not to believe it. Thus falling into the deception.
Storytelling dazzles the defenseless citizens and the journalists themselves. even the best. Matter of laziness, often, or carelessness, haste, connivance or lack of competence. The fact is that the charm of the "good stories" - especially those packed according archetypes established, as good and evil - is hard to resist, even when it is suspected that they can not be true. On closer reflection, the Arab Springs erupted in recent years have been told by the mainstream media as a "process" - as it was right that it was, it is a historical phenomenon - but as a sequence of "stories", selected with the intent to touch hearts more than to speak to the minds, and at the risk of forcing the facts and their interpretation. In telling stories, however, are primarily the protagonists, the governments involved that and their protesters, as has been demonstrated in Libya before and then in Syria. And unravel the sea of misinformation is not easy, even for the most seasoned professionals.
For the same reason it is not easy to understand what is happening in Afghanistan. As he explains Federico Petroni in this issue of Limes President Barack Obama he has managed to shut out the news this unpopular and costly war, which he himself helped to "inflate", both in terms of troops and budget. All thanks to a "narrative" ad hoc, so charming and well articulated media maistream have not actually ever challenged, that is, without ever trying to examine the validity of his thesis. This result also contributed to the growing practice of embedded journalism, that - as I tried to argue , too , based on my experience - is losing autonomy and "tends to develop a point of view close and sympathetic to that of troops. "The result, apparently paradoxical, is that Barack Obama managed within two years to ensure that his constituents, his audience, had little interest in knowing how would end the conflict in Afghanistan. Brought home this objective then changed storytelling, pointing now to bring "home" his boys. And this points to be re-elected.